Key Takeaways:
- Final Section 752 regulations clarify recourse liability allocation, related‑party rules, and tiered partnership treatment.
- New Form 7217 requires partners to report non‑cash distributions, adding another layer of disclosure.
- Partnerships should review basis positions, liability allocations, and internal processes.
—
After years of uncertainty, the IRS issued final Section 752 regulations and expanded partner‑level reporting requirements that will shape how partnerships calculate basis, distribute liabilities, and show property distributions. These updates, finished in late 2024, resolve long‑standing questions about recourse liability allocations and introduce new reporting obligations through Form 7217.
For private companies operating through partnerships, these rules matter. They affect capital account maintenance, basis planning, partner transactions, and year‑end compliance. Now is the time to understand the changes and evaluate their impact across partnership structures.
The Importance of Recourse Liability Allocation
Under Section 752, changes to a partner’s share of partnership liabilities flow directly into a basis. An increase in a liability of a share increases a partner’s basis, while a decrease is treated as a distribution. Whether a liability is recourse or nonrecourse decides how it is distributed.
Liability is recourse when a partner — or a related person — bears the economic risk of loss. The final regulations reaffirm this long‑standing framework but make important changes to how liabilities are shared when multiple partners bear risk for the same obligation, how tiered partnerships allocate liabilities, and how related‑party rules apply.
These rules apply to liabilities incurred or assumed on or after December 2, 2024. Partnerships may choose to apply them earlier, so long as they do so consistently.
A New Proportionality Rule for Overlapping Economic Risk
Historically, there was uncertainty over how to allocate a recourse liability when multiple partners were exposed to loss. The final rules adopt a proportionality rule, resolving this ambiguity.
Under this approach, a partner’s share of the liability equals:
Total liability × (Partner’s economic risk of loss ÷ Total economic risk of loss borne by all partners)
This fractional method improves clarity and reduces the variation created by competing interpretations of economic risk.
The rule also aligns with how economic risk applies in related contexts — including guarantees, indemnities, and pledged collateral. For partnerships with structured financing arrangements — or where multiple partners guarantee the same debt — the proportionality rule provides a clearer roadmap for basis calculations.
Clearer Rules for Tiered Partnerships
Tiered partnerships present more complexity, particularly when a partner in an upper‑tier entity is also a direct partner in a lower‑tier entity. Earlier regulations did not explicitly address how a lower-tier partnership should allocate liabilities in this dual‑ownership situation.
The final rules require the lower‑tier partnership to allocate the liability directly to the partner who bears the economic risk of loss, regardless of whether they hold an upper‑tier or lower‑tier interest.
This clarification resolves a long‑standing gap and reduces the risk that liabilities would be indirectly allocated through multiple layers in ways that distort basis or capital account outcomes.
Updates to Related‑Party Rules
The final regulations revise and refine several related‑party provisions, including:
- Constructive ownership rules
- Exceptions within the related‑party framework
- Application of the multiple partner rule when multiple related partners share exposure
These changes adopt principles articulated in earlier Tax Court decisions, including IPO II v. Commissioner, and improve consistency between risk‑bearing rules and economic substance concepts.
New Ordering Rule for Complex Allocations
Layered rules can create conflicts. To address this, the final regulations introduce an ordering rule that prescribes the sequence for applying:
- The related‑party exception
- The multiple partner rule
- The proportionality rule
This framework provides greater certainty, especially for partnerships with overlapping relationships, guarantor structures, or multi‑tiered interests.
The Introduction of Form 7217 for Property Distributions
In addition to changes affecting liabilities, the IRS issued a new requirement for partners receiving non‑cash property distributions. Beginning with tax years starting in 2024, partners must file Form 7217, Partner’s Report of Property Distributed by a Partnership.
Partners must file a separate Form 7217 for each distribution date, reporting:
- The basis of the distributed property
- Any required basis adjustments
- Property received in tax‑free distributions (including certain marketable securities from investment partnerships)
Marketable securities treated as cash for distribution purposes are generally excluded, unless distributed from investment partnerships eligible for tax‑free treatment.
These requirements reflect the IRS’s continuing push for enhanced disclosure, particularly around partner‑level basis tracking. As more information flows directly to the IRS through partner filings, partnerships should expect more questions — and more requests from limited partners seeking data support.
Planning Considerations
Accumulated updates to liability rules and partner reporting highlight several areas partnerships should evaluate this year:
1. Review Recourse Liability Structures
Guarantees, indemnities, collateral pledges, and other arrangements should be reconsidered under the proportionality and related‑party rules.
2. Analyze Tiered Partnership Interactions
Partnerships with stacked entities should confirm that liabilities are being allocated appropriately to partners who bear economic risk of loss.
3. Test Basis and Capital Accounts
Partnerships may benefit from applying the final regulations retroactively if they produce more favorable allocations — but must adopt them consistently.
4. Prepare for Form 7217 Data Requests
Partnerships should build internal processes to support partners’ filing responsibilities and anticipate added year‑end information requests.
5. Update Agreements and Documentation
Operating agreements, guarantee arrangements, and partner responsibilities should reflect how liabilities and distributions are treated under the final rules.
These steps can help partnerships reduce risk, support compliance, and prepare new levels of transparency.
Supporting Partnership Liability and Reporting Compliance
MGO assists partnerships across industries with recourse liability allocation, basis modeling, and partner‑level reporting. Our team provides support analyzing guarantee structures, navigating the proportionality rule, reviewing tiered partnership arrangements, and preparing for expanded partner disclosure obligations under Form 7217.
As reporting expectations increase, we can help your partnership streamline compliance and plan ahead. Reach out to our team to discuss how we can help you strengthen your reporting approach.